Idealized Fracture Test Problem for Numerical Homogenization Methods


Contents:

Map Image of the Idealized Fracture

Left Matrix Region Fracture Zone Right Matrix Region


Problem Description
This page describes an idealized fracture test problem for numerical homogenization tests. This test problem was proposed by Alain Bourgeat as a means of testing and illustrating the behavior of numerical homogenization on maps that have large contrasts in elliptic coefficients. The basic configuration is a narrow fracture zone separating two regions with lower coefficient values. The figures below show the entire domain along with the three separate regions. The entire domain is comprised of a 52 by 50 set of grid blocks with a constant coefficient value in each grid block. The left and right matrix regions are represented by a 25 by 50 set of grid blocks. The fracture zone is represented by a 2 by 50 set of grid blocks.

The goal is to perform homogenization on the entire region or to combine homogenized versions of the subregions to test the effect of homogenization on the fracture.


Problem/Data Links:
The following is a list of raw data sets that can be downloaded and used as input for your own homogenization codes for testing, input to reservoir simulators and other applications. These maps can also be downloaded and used as input for the JHomogenizer application.
Homogenization Results:
The following gives the values of the tensors in the region or subregion for various types of homogenization applied to the map. Results are given for where the boundary layer regions are regions that include cells neighboring the fracture zone. For example, the simplest case is to take one of the matrix cells from the left region and one of the cells from the right region and include them with the fracture zone. This allows for a smoother transition between the regions with large differences in the value of the tensor.

Region Homogenized: Homogenization Method: Homogenization Tensor:
Entire Region    
  Arithmetic Average:
41.4974 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 41.4974 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 41.4974
  Geometric Average:
29.9091 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 29.9091 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 29.9091
  Harmonic Average:
2.12667 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 2.12667 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 2.12667
  HomCode Average:
2.47067 0.01341 0.0000
0.01341 40.8541 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 41.4972
  Linear Boundary Condition Average:
3.5035 0.0059 0.0000
0.0059 40.9342 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 1.0000
  Fractured Media Tensor Not Applicable
  Linear Boundary Condition Wavelet Average: Not Applicable
  Periodic Wavelet Average: Not Applicable
Left Matrix    
  Arithmetic Average:
3.3827 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 3.3827 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 3.3827
  Geometric Average:
2.4670 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 2.4670 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 2.4670
  Harmonic Average:
2.0822 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 2.0822 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 2.0822
  HomCode Average:
2.58975 0.00898 0.00000
0.00898 2.42125 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 3.3872
  Linear Boundary Condition Average:
2.7398 0.0209 0.00000
0.0209 2.4798 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 1.0000
  Fractured Media Tensor Not Applicable
  Periodic Wavelet Not Applicable
  Linear Boundary Condition Wavelet Not Applicable
Fracture Zone    
  Arithmetic Average:
1001.18 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 1001.18 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 1001.18
  Geometric Average:
1001.18 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 1001.18 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 1001.18
  Harmonic Average:
1001.18 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 1001.18 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 1001.18
  HomCode Average:
1001.18 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 1001.18 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 1001.18
  Linear Boundary Condition Average:
1001.18 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 1001.18 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 1.0000
  Fractured Media Tensor Not Applicable
  Periodic Wavelet Not Applicable
  Linear Boundary Condition Wavelet Not Applicable
Right Matrix    
  Arithmetic Average:
2.6072 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 2.6072 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 2.6072
  Geometric Average:
2.2112 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 2.2112 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 2.2112
  Harmonic Average:
1.9821 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 1.9821 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 1.9821
  HomCode Average:
2.31846 -0.01098 0.0000
-0.01098 2.15021 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 2.60715
  Linear Boundary Condition Average:
2.3555 -0.0198 0.0000
-0.0198 2.1803 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 1.0000
  Fractured Media Tensor Not Applicable
  Periodic Wavelet Not Applicable
  Linear Boundary Condition Wavelet Not Applicable

Simulation Results:
The following graphics show results from simulations performed on heterogeneous maps and the homogenized maps that result from applying various methods of averaging. The heterogeneous map used in the generation of the flow simulations looks like the map above. The simulation results shown below were obtained using maps generated by the JHomogenizer tool. The graphics below were also generated using the JHomogenizer tool. Contents:
Heterogeneous Simulation Results:
Simulations were performed on the map given above. Our interest is looking at the effect of the homogenization methods on the simulation of fluid flowing through porous media. The simulation of the original heterogeneous map is the following.


Elliptic Solution Flux Approximation Flow Approximation (1500 Steps)




The rest of the results show the same simulations as above for the maps resulting from homogenization. The maps are obtained by applying the specified homogenization method to each of the three regions separately and then merging the regions back together. The simulations are all done on the same 52 by 50 mesh one which the original heterogeneous map is defined.


Simulations on the Entire Region

The following simulations were performed on the domain where the heterogeneous map has been replaced by a constant tensor throughout the region. The constant tensor is obtained by the specified averaging method. The simulations were performed on the same grid as the heterogeneous map simulations.

Arithmetic Average on Entire Region


Elliptic Solution Flux Approximation Flow Approximation



Geometric Average on Entire Region


Elliptic Solution Flux Approximation Flow Approximation



HomCode Average on Entire Region


Elliptic Solution Flux Approximation Flow Approximation



Linear Boundary Condition Average on Entire Region


Elliptic Solution Flux Approximation Flow Approximation



Harmonic Average on Entire Region


Elliptic Solution Flux Approximation Flow Approximation




Simulations on the Combined Homogenized Regions

The following simulations were performed on the domain where the heterogeneous map has been replaced by a constant tensor in each of the separate regions - the left matrix, the fracture zone, and the right matrix. The constant tensor is obtained in each of the subregions by the specified averaging method and then the maps for each subregion were connected back together. The simulations were performed on the same grid as the heterogeneous map simulations.

Combined Arithmetic Average


Elliptic Solution Flux Approximation Flow Approximation



Combined Geometric Average


Elliptic Solution Flux Approximation Flow Approximation



Combined HomCode Average


Elliptic Solution Flux Approximation Flow Approximation



Combined Linear Boundary Condition Average


Elliptic Solution Flux Approximation Flow Approximation



Combined Harmonic Average


Elliptic Solution Flux Approximation Flow Approximation




Steps to use JHomogenizer to work with the full fracture map:
To create the results included on these pages you can use the JHomogenizer tool. The instructions for homogenization of the idealized fracture data are in the following how to file.